The T-60 has the best camouflage factor among Tier II light tanks. If that isn't enough the hull is on the small side as well, meaning it is rather easy to hide. It does have a small, low profile turret that makes it a hard target to hit, especially if always on the move. Previous points set the T-60 apart from its contemporaries, due to this the tank requires a different play style. Still, the armour works rather well against autocannons, especially at longer ranges. The only category in which the T-60 is superior is its front and rear hull armour, and even the provided armour values are deceptive as the heavily sloped upper frontal plate is significantly thinner than the lower frontal plate. The T-60 does not have the sheer speed of the BT-2, nor does it have the maneuverability and view range of the T-26. This puts the tank at a relative disadvantage, at least among its Soviet peers. However when mounted on the T-60 the gun has a lower rate of fire and worse aim time compared to the other two. ![]() All three share the same top gun, the 37mm ZiS-19, which has good penetration and accuracy. IĬompared to the other Tier II Soviet tank choices - the BT-2 and T-26 - the T-60 is unremarkable. Very slow acceleration, albeit not as bad as the Cruiser Mk. Armour is very thin on the sides and rear, and the 35mm of sloped armour is only around the beak area ![]() 12.7mm DShK machine gun has extremely poor penetration and lengthy reload despite the extreme damage potential 37mm ZiS-19 has good penetration and accuracy, and acceptable alpha damage Small profile with decent armor and sloping
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |